Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Solve the gap between rich and poor

Solve the gap between rich and poor

1, "high threshold": improving the tax system system. Raise the personal income tax threshold for inheritance tax, gift tax, consumption tax and other taxes to intensify research and the timely introduction; standardizing income distribution monopoly. Taken to standardize the approach will remain under the monopoly of departments and enterprises carried out by the state financial revenue for the state-owned enterprises in monopoly industries, the development; promote the wealth of two or three times the allocation of ... ...

2, "Stubbs low": by increasing the minimum living standard, the minimum wage standards for workers, retirees, such as gold standard, increasing the protection level and income level of low-income people. By strengthening the training and improve the basic education level, employment promotion measures, and continuously improve the employability of low-income people ... ...

3, "expansion of": the proportion of tertiary industry, to increase the proportion of middle-income class to provide an industrial base; increase the knowledge class, the remuneration of professionals, expanding the ranks of middle-income persons; standardizing income distribution order, government organizations and institutions to promote the income distribution system reform ... ...

4, "legislation": People's Political Consultative Conference Standing Committee also recommended speeding up the revenue through the legislative process, the establishment of a sound public financial budget system and establish a revenue monitoring, early warning system, improve relevant laws and regulations, give full play to the banking, finance, auditing, tax regulation and control functions such as supervision so that a fairer and more equitable income distribution.

The income gap will not be expanding

The income gap will not be expanding

State Council Development Research Center Li Jiange, deputy director of the income gap on this issue was questioned. He said, I have little doubt that the reform and opening up, China's regional disparity is not expanding? I do not quite agree. I think the gap will not be too great, but is smaller.

Although there exists a certain gap between rich and poor, when I do not think that continues to grow. Building a harmonious society is necessary to maintain social stability, and narrow the gap between rich and poor is the most important factor, I would like countries to recognize this has been. Take the recent tax law changes for months, the country to use the laws to the regulation of social resources.

China's wage gap is not very big, mainly concentrated in the gray income, the State relies on in order to narrow the gap between rich and poor is necessary to combat gray income. Rich source of first pot of gold in general is unknown, which say their own clean, as long as the big crackdown. I large income gap will come!

To high-income earners to impose high taxes to balance the income gap, but as many areas involving less than to tax. Reasonable to prevent high-income tax avoidance.

The income gap continued to widen

The income gap continued to widen

China's Gini coefficient has exceeded the warning level of 0.4. Worldwide research results show that the income gap in China has been at a high level, and the situation is grim. When we talked about foreign standards, technical, research methods, as has been described as international, can not be said that only a country, that is, these methods have been used repeatedly in different countries, prove that it is universal.

Now is the income gap has widened more and more wealthy people have money, they now have the capital to invest, to probe legal loopholes, the pursuit of wealth for their own purposes. While the poor are getting poorer, with the price increases, most people's money is only enough for their own lives, there is no money to invest, from the crowded teeth in the money also on the banks, simply can not afford to invest risks. Now the polarization is too serious.

Chinese people three questions: can not afford to buy a house, a doctor looking down, reading time can not afford, the Chinese labor is cheap too, and sad! Why the creators of wealth will be a low wage.

In such a large income gap in front, why do not we limit the minimum pay for various types of jobs to prevent any down payment for labor, to prevent the arbitrary deduction and exploitation. Workers in coal mining as an example, in a very high-risk activity, dust a lot of great bodily harm on the environment of operation, a month with more than 1000 yuan a high right?

Income gap between rich and poor lead

Income gap between rich and poor lead

From the National Bureau of Statistics figures show that China's income gap between residents of different levels is gradually widening, high and low income households in the actual standard of living gap is widening. National Bureau of Statistics according to the urban per capita disposable income of high to low queuing and five equal groups, in 2003, accounting for 20% of the overall group with the highest income per capita disposable income was 17,472 yuan, 2012 yuan more than the previous year , an increase of 13.0%; 20% of the total group of the lowest income per capita disposable income was 3295 yuan, 263 yuan more than the previous year, an increase of 8.7%. The highest group and the lowest income group the ratio of 5.1:1 by 2002 expanded to 5.3:1, the highest group of income growth rate was significantly higher than the lowest group.

Gap between rich and poor has nothing to do with the market economy

Gap between rich and poor has nothing to do with the market economy

Market economy is an inevitable trend. But for China, the market economy is developed from scratch, is the gradual establishment of a process. Since China's widening wealth gap to a large extent with the history of the reasonable nature of relevance, then this objective should be recognized, and should not all be negative from a moral and condemnation.

Solve the gap between rich and poor concrete, practical and feasible ways to now probably even did not outline, even if made, this will surely hurt due to a vested interest rather difficult, difficult to implement, I think it is not a solution to the problem of how to improve the economy running mode, but to my party's ability to raise issues.

In the market of different concrete form in different stages, and corresponding relatively affluent social groups. Inevitably, these groups remain the same in the planned economic system within the social groups in the income gap widened.

Many rich people are on their own efforts to have today's achievements, such as: Sohu's Zhang. At that time, the industry is difficult, is through their own efforts with the family business today. If there is the current economic environment, or as if 20 years of planned economy, as he also can not be killed in the United States.

Operating mechanism of a market economy resulted in the establishment of gap between rich and poor

Operating mechanism of a market economy resulted in the establishment of gap between rich and poor

The vast majority of China is not rich or get rich through hard-working capital management to become rich, most of them through the "discovered" the value of state-owned assets, and a low price to buy state-owned assets, resulting in a massive overnight gains.

China's gap between rich and poor is an artificial, cadres are rich, the rich trading power for money, have a relationship with officialdom are rich, and farmers, poor people to death, poverty shall have to go all so rich and there is no fair competition venue are full human network, power control of elections, the National People's Congress did not point the relationship with the people, nor a poor, everywhere are and elections have been child's play, so how much gap between rich and poor.

Twenty times the public service pension income of the farmers, China's labor is still work hours a day, eat what the labor department, the courts are to decide cases based on the background of bribery, public security what to eat, where are all over injustice, the party branch is doing to eat, they are all violations of law and discipline on how the Chinese do not eat the gap between the rich and the poor little me.

Those government officials and public enterprises the wage of a jumped up, as well as protection and allowances and other 7788's, not gray income, who knows how their money is to you? Not all country money? He used that power and drilling in a variety of economic and legal loopholes to become rich.

Market economy, the wealth gap in it?

Market economy, the wealth gap in it?

In our country, with the market economy mechanism, there are indeed some people may trend through the bear commercial risks, access to huge wealth. However, can not be denied that a considerable portion of rich people who did not bear any market risk, they only state-owned property behind the market value of "discovered" them, and through restructuring and other means to possession only. Although such a person is one of the few, but they share the wealth is very great. On the surface, these people through the transactions to obtain profits. However, in essence, they did not pay any of the "on price." They are just under the banner of reform in the guise of, misappropriation of state-owned assets only. This money deals with the process of wealth accumulation color, of course, should be cast aside by society as a whole.

Breakthrough in a reasonable degree of gap between rich and poor

Breakthrough in a reasonable degree of gap between rich and poor

According to UNDP statistics, China's Gini coefficient was 0.45. 20% of the total population of the poorest population of income or consumption share of only 4.7%, while 20 percent of the total population of the most affluent population share of income or consumption as high as 50%.

What is worrisome is that China's widening wealth gap are too large, too fast. In a short span of time more than 20 years, China has equalitarianism from a country rife with change for the widening wealth gap is a serious problem, the income gap over the international upper-middle level of national inequality. Although the "gap between rich and poor penetration limit" in a "reasonable limit" is only a vague concept, but obviously, our country has been a larger gap between rich and poor is an indisputable fact.